A client asks whether the bank will fund something, and you would rather not
guess. Describe the situation here the way you would describe it to a colleague. Appetite reads
it against published lender policy and comes back in about 90 seconds with whether it is
fundable, how it is likely to structure, and what a lender will want to see. Lender names are
withheld on this page — what you get is the reasoning, not a list to shop.
If it is worth doing, you send it back to the broker who invited you, and to
nobody else. Appetite does not take the deal, does not contact your client, and does not
pass the scenario to any brokerage. There is no cost and nothing to sign.
Invited by
The scenario
Write it as a situation, not a file. You do not need to name your client, and
you should not: no field here asks for their identity and none is stored.
A read takes 90 to 150 seconds. No sign-up to run it.
Reading your scenario0s elapsed
Sequence, not a progress bar — the timer is the live figure. Nothing here
is cached or pre-computed; the engine is reading your scenario now.
The read
ResidentialThis scenario reads as residential lending. It is shown in full, but a
residential facility is regulated credit and belongs with a broker who holds the right
accreditation and credit authority.
Masked — names withheld
The pathway
The shortlist — how each option stacks up
Lender identities are withheld on this page by design. Your broker
works the named market; this read is here so you know whether it is worth their time.
Ruled out — and why
To firm this up, we'd ask
Worth knowing
Send it back
✓
Bookmark this to check where it is up to.
Results on this page can be sent straight back to a
broker, but only through their own invite link. Ask the broker you work with for one — it looks
like a link ending in /advisors with a code on the end — and open this
page from that, and the send step appears here.